A Teoria das Molduras Relacionais (RFT) e a Linguística de Noam Chomsky: uma aproximação possível?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2021.v12.RFT.14Palavras-chave:
linguagem, Noam Chomsky, Teoria das Molduras relacionaisResumo
A “Resenha” do “Comportamento Verbal”, de B. F. Skinner, publicada por Noam Chomsky em 1959, criou uma cisão profunda e duradoura entre a Linguística e a Análise do Comportamento. Considerando as mudanças no estudo da linguagem trazidas pela Teoria das Molduras Relacionais (RFT) e a disposição explícita da Ciência Comportamental Contextual para colaborar com outras áreas do conhecimento, o objetivo do presente estudo consistiu em analisar a possibilidade de diálogo, identificando convergências e divergências, entre a Linguística de matriz chomskyana e a RFT. Diversos pontos de convergência entre ambas perspectivas foram encontrados, a maioria dos quais não seriam possíveis partindo dos pressupostos skinnerianos. Contudo, profundas divergências, principalmente de ordem epistemológica, persistem ainda. Portanto, apesar das aproximações mencionadas, não é claro como poderia ser articulada uma colaboração significativa e produtiva para ambas abordagens.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press. (Obra original publicada em 1955).
Bandini, C. S. M., de Rose, J. C. (2010). Chomsky e Skinner e a polémica sobre a geratividade da linguagem. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva. XII(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v12i1/2.414
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 69–84.
Biglan, A. (2016). A Functional Contextualist Approach to Cultural Evolution. In R. D. Zettle; S.C. Hayes; D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 385–397). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bilgrami, A. (2018). Prefácio. In N. Chomsky, Que tipo de criaturas somos nós? (pp. 7–25.) (Gabriel de Ávila Othero & Luisandro Mendes de Souza, trads.) Editora Vozes.
Blackledge, J.T. (2003). An introduction to Relational Frame Theory: Basics and Applications. The Behavior Analyst Today. 3(4), 421–432, http://doi.org/10.1037/h0099997.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674594623.c6
Chomsky, N. (2018). Que tipo de criaturas somos nós? (Gabriel de Ávila Othero & Luisandro Mendes de Souza, trads.). Editora Vozes.
Day, W. F. (1969). On certain similarities between the Philosophical Investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Operationism of B. F. Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 12(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-489
De Houwer, J. (2013). Foreword. E, S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in Relational Frame Theory (pp. 5–26). Context Press.
Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the
A Teoria das Molduras Relacionais (RFT) e a Linguística de Noam Chomsky: uma aproximação possível? 001-013
Revista Perspectivas 2021 Early View RFT Special Volume pp.001-013 12 www.revistaperspectivas.org
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.45-05
Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., Callahan, T. D., & Stoddard, L. T. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43(4), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395911
Eldredge, N. & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Em T.J.M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp. 82–115). Princeton University Press.
Escandell Vidal, M. V. (2018). El lenguaje y la lingüística. Em M.V. Escandell Vidal (Ed.), Claves del Lenguaje Humano (pp. 1–32). Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Hayes, S. C. (1987). Language and the incompatibility of evolutionary and psychological continuity. Behavior Analysis, 22(2), 49–54. https://contextualscience.org/publications/hayes_1987_1
Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown Stimulus Equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51(3), 385–292. https://doi.org/ 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385
Hayes, L. (1993). Reality and Truth. Em S. C. Hayes, L. Hayes, H. W. Reese & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.) Varieties of Scientific Contextualism (pp. 35–50). Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes, S. C., Blackledge, J. T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. Em Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 3-20). Kluwer Academic Publishers
Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E. V., Wilson, K. G., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healy, O. (2001). Derived Relational Responding as Learned Behavior. Em S.C. Hayes; D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: a Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition (pp. 3–20). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual Behavioral Science: creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCBS.2012.09.004
Hayes, S. C., & Long, D. M. (2013). Contextual Behavioral Science, Evolution, and Scientific Epistemology. Em S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in Relational Frame Theory (pp. 5–26). Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. T. (2014). Cooperation came first: Evolution and human cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.64
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: Working out the similarities and differences between human and non-human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.60
Levin M. E., Twohig, M. P. & Smith, B. M. (2016). Contextual Behavioral Science: An Overview. Em R.D. Zettle, S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 17–36). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 13(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1901%2Fjeab.1970.13-83
McIntire, K. D., Cleary, J., & Thompson, T. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.47-279
Monestès, J. L. (2016). A Functional Place for Language in Evolution: The Contribution of Contextual Behavioral Science to the Study of Human Evolution. In R. D. Zettle; S.C. Hayes; D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 100–114). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Palmer, D. C. (2006). On Chomsky’s appraisal of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A half century of misunderstanding. The Behavior Analyst. 29(2), 253–267. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/BF03392134
Jaume Ferran Aran Cebria, Gleice Magalhães de Oliveira 001-013
Revista Perspectivas 2021 Early View RFT Special Volume pp.001-013 13 www.revistaperspectivas.org
Pepper, S. C. (1942/1972). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. California University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 7(4), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002673X
Skinner, B. F. (1945/1984). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 7, 547–553 (trabalho originalmente publicado em 1945). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062535
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Copley Publishing Group.
Vaughan, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.14.1.36
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trad. Jorge Arthur Giannoti. Companhia Editora Nacional. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo. (Obra original publicada em 1922).
Wittgenstein, L. (2014). Investigações filosóficas. Trad. Marcos G. Montangoli. Editora Universitária São Francisco. (Obra original publicada em 1953).
Bandini, C. S. M., de Rose, J. C. (2010). Chomsky e Skinner e a polémica sobre a geratividade da linguagem. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva. XII(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v12i1/2.414
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 69–84.
Biglan, A. (2016). A Functional Contextualist Approach to Cultural Evolution. In R. D. Zettle; S.C. Hayes; D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 385–397). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bilgrami, A. (2018). Prefácio. In N. Chomsky, Que tipo de criaturas somos nós? (pp. 7–25.) (Gabriel de Ávila Othero & Luisandro Mendes de Souza, trads.) Editora Vozes.
Blackledge, J.T. (2003). An introduction to Relational Frame Theory: Basics and Applications. The Behavior Analyst Today. 3(4), 421–432, http://doi.org/10.1037/h0099997.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674594623.c6
Chomsky, N. (2018). Que tipo de criaturas somos nós? (Gabriel de Ávila Othero & Luisandro Mendes de Souza, trads.). Editora Vozes.
Day, W. F. (1969). On certain similarities between the Philosophical Investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Operationism of B. F. Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 12(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-489
De Houwer, J. (2013). Foreword. E, S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in Relational Frame Theory (pp. 5–26). Context Press.
Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the
A Teoria das Molduras Relacionais (RFT) e a Linguística de Noam Chomsky: uma aproximação possível? 001-013
Revista Perspectivas 2021 Early View RFT Special Volume pp.001-013 12 www.revistaperspectivas.org
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.45-05
Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., Callahan, T. D., & Stoddard, L. T. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43(4), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395911
Eldredge, N. & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Em T.J.M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp. 82–115). Princeton University Press.
Escandell Vidal, M. V. (2018). El lenguaje y la lingüística. Em M.V. Escandell Vidal (Ed.), Claves del Lenguaje Humano (pp. 1–32). Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Hayes, S. C. (1987). Language and the incompatibility of evolutionary and psychological continuity. Behavior Analysis, 22(2), 49–54. https://contextualscience.org/publications/hayes_1987_1
Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown Stimulus Equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51(3), 385–292. https://doi.org/ 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385
Hayes, L. (1993). Reality and Truth. Em S. C. Hayes, L. Hayes, H. W. Reese & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.) Varieties of Scientific Contextualism (pp. 35–50). Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes, S. C., Blackledge, J. T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. Em Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 3-20). Kluwer Academic Publishers
Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E. V., Wilson, K. G., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healy, O. (2001). Derived Relational Responding as Learned Behavior. Em S.C. Hayes; D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: a Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition (pp. 3–20). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual Behavioral Science: creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCBS.2012.09.004
Hayes, S. C., & Long, D. M. (2013). Contextual Behavioral Science, Evolution, and Scientific Epistemology. Em S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in Relational Frame Theory (pp. 5–26). Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. T. (2014). Cooperation came first: Evolution and human cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.64
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: Working out the similarities and differences between human and non-human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.60
Levin M. E., Twohig, M. P. & Smith, B. M. (2016). Contextual Behavioral Science: An Overview. Em R.D. Zettle, S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 17–36). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 13(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1901%2Fjeab.1970.13-83
McIntire, K. D., Cleary, J., & Thompson, T. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.47-279
Monestès, J. L. (2016). A Functional Place for Language in Evolution: The Contribution of Contextual Behavioral Science to the Study of Human Evolution. In R. D. Zettle; S.C. Hayes; D. Barnes-Holmes & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science (pp. 100–114). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Palmer, D. C. (2006). On Chomsky’s appraisal of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A half century of misunderstanding. The Behavior Analyst. 29(2), 253–267. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/BF03392134
Jaume Ferran Aran Cebria, Gleice Magalhães de Oliveira 001-013
Revista Perspectivas 2021 Early View RFT Special Volume pp.001-013 13 www.revistaperspectivas.org
Pepper, S. C. (1942/1972). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. California University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 7(4), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002673X
Skinner, B. F. (1945/1984). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 7, 547–553 (trabalho originalmente publicado em 1945). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062535
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Copley Publishing Group.
Vaughan, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.14.1.36
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trad. Jorge Arthur Giannoti. Companhia Editora Nacional. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo. (Obra original publicada em 1922).
Wittgenstein, L. (2014). Investigações filosóficas. Trad. Marcos G. Montangoli. Editora Universitária São Francisco. (Obra original publicada em 1953).
Downloads
Publicado
13-08-2021
Como Citar
Cebria, J. F. A. ., & de Oliveira, G. M. . (2021). A Teoria das Molduras Relacionais (RFT) e a Linguística de Noam Chomsky: uma aproximação possível?. Perspectivas Em Análise Do Comportamento, 12(1), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2021.v12.RFT.14
Edição
Seção
Artigos
